“The charges are not that serious. In NY it would have been a really minor incident.”
When I decided to phone the Jonathan LeVine gallery which represents Olek, I knew that they would have been fielding calls all day. Since word had gone live via the Jerry Saltz page on Facebook, three or four articles, including my own, had hit the air overnight. But Jonathan LeVine took my call. It felt good to have an opportunity once and for all to clear up all the doubt, and also to learn where Olek’s representation was in all this.
What follows is a transcript of our phone conversation:
TAM: Did Olek call you right away after the incident happened?
JL: I think I learned about it pretty quickly after it happened. After she got out of jail.
TAM: So when she called you, was she distraught?
JL: No I haven’t spoken to her on the phone. It’s all through e-mail.
TAM: Oh. Hmmm. I see. So you’ve never spoken to her on the phone.
JL: No, I haven’t spoken to her on the phone.But we’re in contact with her all the time. We just represented her in a fair. I mean, she just signed a bunch of prints for us so it’s — it’s definitely her that I’m in contact with if that’s the question.
TAM: [Laughing]Yeah, well that is DEFinitely the question.”
JL: [Laughing] Well it’s definitely her.
TAM: It’s the question that’s on top of everybody’s minds.
JL: This isn’t a hoax. I mean it’s legitimate. And she doesn’t have money and it’s very expensive to deal with the attorney.
TAM: Right. But people are confused, like about how she was able to set up that page which they think looks very elaborate — it has a bunch of links for PayPal and stuff like that— Did anyone advise her that this might not look good?
JL: Well, initially — this conversation was going on for a while– and her attorney was saying that maybe — she shouldn’t say much about it. So her attorney advised her not to do it. But she didn’t have any other way so her attorney said okay you can do this.
TAM: Do you have any details of her case that she’s not put online?
JL: No. I mean I can’t say anything. I can’ t say anything more than she said about it.
TAM: So you KNOW more you just can’t SAY more.
JL: That’s correct.
TAM: So you are clear about the incident and how it linked to her arrest.
JL: Yes. Yes I am. As a matter of fact I helped her find her attorney through some of my contacts in England.
TAM: So is there a fundraiser maybe coming up?
JL: You know hadn’t actually thought about that. Because this thing initially–we weren’t supposed to talk about it so– it wasn’t even until last night that she posted it.
She was debating about whether she was going to make it live or not. So I guess it went live last night. I come in today and have a whole bunch of people calling me.
TAM: Well it went live last night because it kind of went live on Jerry Saltz’s page.
JL: Yes. That’s right.
I think we’re probably going to give it a couple more days. You know. See what goes on before I start talking about that–because it just went live and I want to see what happens. And also we need time for a little organization to put togther a fundrasier. I’m not opposed to it at all. Someone asked about it on Facebook and I hadn’t really thouhyt about it all because this all just happened [snaps fingrs] just like that.
I’m just going on the advice of what she tells me to do and what her attorney is telling her to do.
TAM: Right. Well, just now I e-mailed her and she just said I’m tired of this and if people don’t believe me then they can’t help me. But I really think that people are so used to being scammed and this sounds so much like a million of them.
TAM: Really and people can’t help but want the details.
TAM: And they also want to know who they’re defending. I mean if the charges are that serious…you know then—
JL: I don’t think that the charges are that serious…but I just think that she was just treated in a certain way.
And in New York, I feel that it would have been a really minor incident. And for whatever reason it turned into something bigger than maybe it should have.
TAM: Wow. That’s horrible for her.
JL: It is. It is pretty horrible. It’s kind of a messed up situation. I really — I don’t want to say too much because I can’t.
TAM: Right okay… is there anything else, when I write this story up, that you’d like to put out there to clear things up?
JL: “I would just say that it’s legitimate. And she’s just in a situation that’s unfortunate. I guess what happened is she didn’t have any contacts there and so she didn’t have an attorney to call and she didn’t have money for that either so I guess she just ended up with just what was given to her.
TAM: So why didn’t she have any contacts? Is Olek that much of a loner?
JL: Well, if you’re in England and you get arrested…and she lives in the US she’s Polish. I don’t even know if she’s been there before. She doesn’t know a lot of people there. And at first maybe she thought is wasn’t going to be that serious either.
TAM: Right. And did they take her cell phone away?”
JL: I don’ know what they did. I don’t know anything about getting arrested in England.
I can’t really speak for her because I didn’t ask her any of these questions. I didn’t like interrogate her to see what the hell happened. You know it’s more like ‘this is what happened, this is the situation’ ‘oh okay ’ —So I immediately contacted somebody that I know that helped her find a suitable attorney.
TAM: Right I see.
JL: And that’s where she’s at right now
TAM: Well, Jonathan, thank you so much. This has actually cleared up — well, a LITTLE bit …[laughing] it’s still a mystery.
JL: I’m sorry I can’t give you any more information. But I can say that it s legitimate. I can say that here it would have been something minor but –you know– she got a bad attorney and now she is in a situation.
TAM: And is it safe to say that you’re still talking to her about this and about when you can release information?
JL: Yes. Absolutely.
The Jonathan LeVine Gallery has posted Olek’s appeal on its site
Updates Regarding Charges and Trial Date
The charges against her are as follows..
Wounding with intent.
Grievous bodily harm without intent.
Assault by beating.
Possession of a knife.
Trial date set for September 3rd.
Source: Southwark Crown Court Central Office.
Those are hair-raising charges. I marvel. I marvel as well at how bloody long they can detain someone w/out trial. September 3rd. Damn!
She’s not detained, she’s out on bail after posting a surety bond.
I do not understand why the gallery does not give her the funds she needs.
My guess is they don’t have enough money to do that.